PELVIMETRY BY IMAGING CURRENT STATUS

Authors

  • BJJ ABDULLAH DEPARTMENTS OF RADIOLOGY
  • S. RAMAN OBSTRETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, FACULTY OF MEDICINE, UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA
  • J. MAHADEVAN DEPARTMENTS OF RADIOLOGY
  • D. CHIEN SIEMENS LTD., HONG KONG

Abstract

The role of pelvimetry in the management of complicated pregnancy warrants investigation. There is probably agreement that there is a role in the assessment of a breech pregnancy where vaginal delivery is contemplated. Conventional pelvimetry is still carried out in many centers throughout the world. The radiation dose to the fetus and mother has caused concern leading to changes such as the use of intensifying screens, air gap technique, computed tomography (CT) pelvimetry, digital pelvimetry and now magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pelvimetry. The advantages of MRI have been the absence of radiation, shorter duration of examination and the absence of distortion of measurements from magnification. The ability to define the soft tissue may also be important though this has not yet been determined. One of the major limitations of MRI was the question of cost but this was based on the older longer sequences. Presently with the availability of newer shorter sequences, the examination could be carried-out much faster and therefore should be really cost-effective.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Parsons MT & Specally WN. Prospective randomized study of X-ray pelvimetry in the primigravida. Obstet Gynaecol 1985. 66:76-79

Thubisi M, Ebrahim A, Moodley et al. Vaginal delivery after previous caesarean- section: is X-ray pelvimetry necessary? Bi J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:421-424

Morrison JJ, Sinnatamy, Hackett GA, et al. Obstetric pelvimetry in the UK: an ap- praisal of current practice. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;102:748-750

Krishnamurthy S, Fairlie F, Cameron AD et al. The role of postnatal X-ray pelvim- etry after caeserian section in the manage- ment of subsequent delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991;98:716-718

van Loon AJ, Mantingh A, Thijn CJP et al. Pelvimetry by magnetic resonance im- aging in breech presentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;163:1256-1260

Flanagan TA, Mulchahey KM, Korenbrot CC et al Management of term breech pre- sentation. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 1987: 156:1492-1499

Compton AA. Soft tissues and pelvic dys- tocia. Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1987;30:69

Biswas A & Johnstone MJ. Term breech delivery. Aust NZJ Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 33:150-153

Boice JD & Land CE. Ionizing radiation. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF, eds. Can- cer epidemiology and prevention. Phila- delphia: WB Saunders, 1982:137-238

Mole RH. Childhood cancer after prena- tal exposure to diagnostic X-ray examina- tions in Britain. Br J Cancer 1990;62:171

Badr I, Thomas SM, Cotterill D, Pettett A, Oduko JM, Fitzgerald M & Adam EJ. X-ray pelvimetry - Which is the best tech- nique? Clinical Radiology 1997;52:136- 141

Wright AR, English PT, Cameron HM et al. MR pelvimetry-A Practical alternative. Acta Radiologica 1992;33:582-587

Wright DJ, Godding L, Kirkpateick C. Technical note: Digital radiographic pel- vimetry - a novel, low dose, accurate tech- nique. The British Journal of Radiology 1995;68:528-530

Kopelman JN, Duff P, Karl RT et al. Com- puted tomography in the evaluation of breech presentation. Obstet Gynacol 1986; 68:455-458

Raman S, Samuel D & Suresh K. A com parative study of X-ray pelvimetry and CT pelvimetry. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1991;31:217-220

Davidson R. CT pelvimetry: a two view approach. Radiograph 1986:33;62-6

Federle MA, Cohen HA, Rosenwein MF, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Cann LE. Pelvim etry by digital radiography: a low dose ex- amination. Radiology 1982:143;733-5

Weisen EJ, Crass JR, Bello EM et al Im- provement in CT pelvimetry. Radiology 1991;178:259

Bian XM, Zhuang J, Cheng X. Pelvic mea- surements by transvaginal ultrasound. Chinese J Med 1991;71:453-454

National Radiation Protection Board: Lim its on patient and volunteer exposure dur ing clinical magnetic resonance proce- dures. Documents of the NRPB, vol 2, no. 1. Her Majesty's Stationary Office, Lon don 1991.

McCarthy SM, Filly RA, Stark SM, et al Obstetrical magnetic resonance imaging. Fetal anatomy. Radiology 1985;154:427

McCarthy SM, Stark SM, Filly RA, et al Obstetrical magnetic resonance imaging. Maternal anatomy. Radiology 1985;154: 421-426

Campbell JA. X-ray pelvimetry. J Natl Med Assoc 1975:68;514-520

Abdullah BJJ, Mahadevan J, Raman S & Chien D. Comparison of the various new MRI sequences in pelvimetry (Abs). Ad- vances in MRI-Second International Magnetom Vision User Conference, Rotterdam, June 13-14, 1997

Melchert F, Wischnik & Nalepa E. The prevention of birth trauma by means of computer aided simulation of the delivery by means of the nuclear magnetic reso- nance imaging and finite element analy- sis. J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;21:195-207

Downloads

Published

2023-04-08

How to Cite

1.
ABDULLAH B, RAMAN S, MAHADEVAN J, CHIEN D. PELVIMETRY BY IMAGING CURRENT STATUS. ASEAN J Radiol [Internet]. 2023 Apr. 8 [cited 2024 May 16];4(1):99-103. Available from: https://www.asean-journal-radiology.org/index.php/ajr/article/view/429

Issue

Section

Original Article