COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STANDARD FRACTIONATION AND REDUCED FRACTIONATION RADIOTHERAPY IN UTERINE CERVICAL CANCER.

Authors

  • S. PENPATTANAGUL DEPARTMENT OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY UDORN REGIONAL CANCER CENTER THAILAND

Abstract

During the first of January 1998 to 30th of September 2000, new uterine cervical cancer patients were double-blinded randomly devided into 2 groups to receive a daily radiation dose fraction of 200 cGy or 250 cGy. In the standard treatment group, 20 fractions of 200 cGy were given to the pelvis and 5 fractions of 200 cGy were given to the parametria in addition. Three more fractions were given to boost the parametrial doses in stage IIIB patients. In the reduced fractionation group 15 fractions were given for the whole pelvis and 4 fractions for the parametria. Two booster doses to the parametria were given in stage IIIB. Both groups were treated 5 fractions per week. Time-dosefraction calculation formular (TDF) was used to determine the number of fractions. Both groups were given intracavitary radiation with Cesium LDR machine 24-26 Gy by single insertion. Residual tumor, local recurrent tumor, metastasis and complication were compared by T-test evaluation with 95 % confidence interval. The study showed worse local control in the reduced fractionation group in stage IIIB patients. Better local control in the reduced fractionation group in stage IB patients. No significant SEPT. - DEC. 2001. Volume VII Number III difference was seen in the early and late complication of radiation of both groups.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Vatanasapt V, et al.: Cancer in Thailand 1988-1991. IARC Technical Report no 16,1993:59-60.

Jampolis S, Andras J, Fletcher GH: Pelvic failure in Ca Cervix after radiation: Radiology 1975; 115: 681-685

Greenberg M, Eisert DR, Cox JD: Initial evaluation of reduced fractionation in the irradiation of malignant epithelial tumors. Am J Roentgen Radium Ther Nucl Med 1976; 126: 268-278

Byhardt RW, Freenberg M, Cox JD: Local control of squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity and oropharynx with 3 vs 5 treatment fractions per week, Int J Radio Oncol Biol Phys 1977;2:415-420

Marcial VA: Radiation Therapy of cervical cancer: present at the National conference of Gynecologic Cancers, Orlando, Florida, April 2-4,1992

Harwood AR, Beale FA, Cummings JB, et al: Supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma: An analysis of dose-time-volume factors in 410 patients: Int J Radio Oncol Bio Phys 9:311,1983

Wang CC: Altered fractionation radiation therapy for gynecologic cancers. Cancer 60:2064-2067, 1987

Marcial VA, Amato D, Marks RD, et al: Split-course versus continuous pelvis irradiation in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: A prospective randomized clinical trial of the radiation therapy oncology group. Int J Radiat Oncol Bio Phys 9:431- 436,1983

Marcial VA, Komaki R, : Altered fractionation and extended field irradiation of carcinoma of cervix.Cancer 76 (suppli) : 2152-2158, 1995

Perez CA, Grigsby PW, Nene SM, Camel HM, Galalatos A, Kao MS, Lockett MA; Effect of tumor size on the prognosis of carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with irradiation alone: Cancer 62: 2796- 2806,1992

Perez CA, Breaus S, Madoc-Jones H, et al: Radiation therapy alone in the treatment of carcinoma of uterine cervix.I. Analysis of tumor recurrence. Cancer 51: 1393- 1402,1983

Downloads

Published

2023-04-13

How to Cite

1.
PENPATTANAGUL S. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STANDARD FRACTIONATION AND REDUCED FRACTIONATION RADIOTHERAPY IN UTERINE CERVICAL CANCER. ASEAN J Radiol [Internet]. 2023 Apr. 13 [cited 2024 May 19];7(3):217-26. Available from: https://www.asean-journal-radiology.org/index.php/ajr/article/view/582

Issue

Section

Original Article